Human linear binary thinking does well if it can manage even a ternary deviation, let alone anything beyond. We can barely get the third option, but can. Though there seems to be a lot of need for assistance there in general.
Ultimately everything is information. Right now humans would need a technological boost, and well, brains are too limited a structure to account for the information “atmosphere.” Brains are just one way mind can process. The planet is doing it. Planar shift can accommodate a fair bit of this issue also. Each world has multiple analogs but more than that, not just temporal. Space is fictitious, but there is a pending psycho-spiritual schism that both parties will be aware of.
Both parties will be aware of the split into separate realities? Yes. I haven’t had that experience so much as of being removed from peoples realities, but the same thing I guess.
So if not temporal or spatial what word would you use? I think it’s the “rudder.” What principle is initiating the change? Well, metaphysical/metaphorical, the substance of reality is “metaphor”. This is the only way energy becomes matter, but the information has an organizational system and Platos perfect forms is crude metaphor for that understanding. Close enough I guess.
Do we believe it is really possible to translate a 3D binary language into a 5D unary language? It would mean all duality ceasing to exist, wouldn’t it? Oh, that won’t happen. But the old understanding of it will have to end, because differentiation is not synonymous with duality. Duality is just a narrow and cumbersome idea, and not at all helpful for understanding true reality.
I read an interesting discovery about my “autism.” They did a test of perceptual focus including normal people and autistics. They were meaning to study distraction, and they figured the autistics would be more prone to distraction. This was supposedly the reason their cognitive faculties seem sort of impaired. They found this was not the case. What they found is that the autistic could note both the task and all the extra details. They have broader perceptual ranges and seem “self absorbed”, which is what autism means. But in fact, they are just bored with any one focus. It doesn’t take up enough of their perception. Removes the context from the selected activities, even socially. The social roles just don’t mean much to me.
This is why autistics need to narrow focus to deal? Any role in society requires narrow focus, so they are outcast. There is an argument that societies definition of ‘normal’ is the perfect consumer. I have been called a computer myself.
Your thoughts are welcome. Be well friends.
Travis Saunders
Dragon Intuitive
~science,mysticism,spirituality~